Skip to main content

CRISPR and genome edited crops - what it means for agriculture

In the last few years, you may have heard the term “CRISPR” – pronounced ‘crisper’ – pop up a few times. But what exactly is CRISPR, and why is it so important?

Well, in order to answer that, let’s first pay a quick visit to 2012. That was the year that Jennifer Doudna – a professor of molecular biology at the University of California, Berkeley – and her team characterized the activity of what’s now known as CRISPR-cas9. The Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) technology and CRISPR Associated System (cas) was first discovered in bacteria as a defense against foreign viruses and DNA. Eventually, its use progressed into eukaryotic cells for purposes of modification, as the technology was adapted by the Broad Institute for genetic engineering. So how is this accomplished? Basically, CRISPR-cas9 consists of two main parts: the cas9 enzyme, which is capable of cutting DNA at specific locations within the genome – think of pair of molecular scissors – and guide RNA that can allow CRISPR to cut precisely at the right point. Together, this means that we are theoretically capable of editing genetic information at the source – by physically changing the genome. Because of this, CRISPR revolutionized genetic modification and engineering for the 21st century, and is perhaps one of the most interesting technological developments of our generation and modern history as an entirety. Although it must be noted that grave questions regarding its applications and ethics have been raised, CRISPR is coming to agriculture and offers an promising avenue to address contemporary and future issues of food security. For some more basic information about CRISPR, check out this fact sheet here: https://www.yourgenome.org/facts/what-is-crispr-cas9

The technology itself is widely applicable, and one of its pressing applications is its use in agriculture, where the bold potential of this genetic engineering, combined with improvements in policy, offers a promising outlook for the future. Think of engineered drought resistant crops or disease resistant wheat or livestock immune from swine flu or better nutrition. CRISPR edited crops are an example of what has come to be known by some as “genome-edited crops,” which represent a shift away from the traditional genetically modified organisms, or GMOs. For a detailed description of the differences between the two, as well as some extraneous information, take a look at this article here: http://www.businessinsider.com/difference-between-genetically-edited-crops-and-gmos-2016-2


Of course, this is by no means the holy grail to the problem of sustainable and productive agriculture, and not all applications of CRISPR will bring about positive change. As you all continue your research, I encourage you to not limit yourselves to just this idea, but rather, explore different research areas and scientific progress as a whole. However, the prevalence of CRISPR within the scientific community does draw focus to the use of genetic engineering and modern biotechnology, in addition to sustainable agricultural practices, in improving crop productivity and quality.

Some interesting questions to consider include: 1) what is the current status of the use of CRISPR in agriculture, and what might change in the future? 2) Are genome-edited crops safe, and if so, how do we overcome the stigmas associated with GMOs? 3) What are some regulatory frameworks we need to consider with this new technology? 4) Where does your country stand on CRISPR and what policies have they implemented?


If you’re interested, an article published in Nature proposes a “regulatory framework for genome-edited crops,” but the article is pretty dense, so don’t feel obligated at all to read it. https://www.nature.com/articles/ng.3484.pdf?origin=ppub

Comments

  1. The delegation of New Zealand acknowledges that CRISPR is a revolutionary technological advance that could be used to engineer crops and dramatically increase food production. In addition, this technology could potentially be used to create crops that are resistant to the effects of climate change. However, New Zealand believes that UNESCO should be particularly careful regarding this new technology. Although it may seem that only one gene is being altered, a slight genetic change can have innumerable effects and repercussions that can potentially be devastating to biodiversity or the human population.
    New Zealand has been extremely cautious with the use of GM techniques and crops and has strict regulations on GMOs. Currently, New Zealand does not produce any genetically modified crops. New Zealand has also faced the option of using CRISPR to eradicate predatory invasive species, but has chosen not to use it.
    We look forward to further discussing this issue in committee!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Republic of Chile agrees with the use of CRISPR and is currently working to understand this technology in relation to salom genome but it does require a strong background in molecular issues. According to the www.yourgenome.com website linked in the blog it stated that the use of CRISPR-Cas9 is “fastest, cheapest, and most reliable system for ‘editing’ genes.” Chile agrees with it and the use of this technology seeing as the world population is predicted to grow between 7.2 billion to 10.6 billion by 2050. CRISPR will allow food to withstand harsh climate changes and for food to be sustained for future generations.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Republic of Germany recognizes the scientific developments within the agricultural industry, such as CRISP. Genome edited crops bring up a multitude of political, social, and economic aspects that must be addressed, so as the delegation of Germany, a nation at the forefront of agricultural sustainability and safety as one of Europe’s largest agricultural importers and exporters, we believe that addressing these specific issues is imperative in creating not only long term sustainable development within all nations, but is crucial in planting and maintaining the seeds of food security.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Welcome to UNESCO!

Hi everyone! My name is Henry Dong, and I'm going to be your head chair this year for UNESCO. I'm super stoked to meet you all in March, but I'll take a quick moment to introduce myself. I'm currently a junior here at Berkeley, but I'm originally from Irvine, which is located in Orange County in Southern California. At Berkeley, I'm studying Molecular and Cell Biology and Cognitive Science, and my overall interests include healthcare, education, and technology. Outside of classes, I love swimming, rock-climbing, listening to music, and watching Hulu/Netflix. I also enjoy playing basketball, and can occasionally get carried away watching it. Personally, I found MUN to be one of my most formative high school experiences, and I joined BMUN because I was looking for a similar kind of community. I'm really excited to hear all the ideas that you're going to bring to BMUN LXVI, and I look forward to getting to know you all!

Water in Iran

            As we have read in the topic synopsis and previous blog posts, droughts and famines can bring political unrest with them. Scientists point out that these events will only become more common and extreme with climate change. Many parts of the world are currently under drought, and one of those places in Iran. This has been one of the driest years in recent history for Iran and the future doesn’t look much better as it is predicted that Iran will close the rain year at 80% below average rainfall. Iran’s Drought and Crisis Management Center has declared that 96% of Iran’s land is under “prolonged drought conditions.”             One of the biggest problems that this drought has brought to Iran is water scarcity. Farmers in rural areas do not have enough water to farm and as the LA Times article points out, there have been protests by farmers who feel that the government is not addressing their problems. There was one instance when communities in the mount